Clifford Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Clifford - Essay ExampleEvidential theory was in that locationfore seen as an attempt to disrupt the peoples believes in God, because it justified an action basing on the institution of an evidence to support the claim. The position of this paper, is that the theory of evidentialism is the best system of justifying the occurrences of events and a judgment in a deity. Arguments According to the theory of evidentialism, an individual needs to believe an bailiwick or an idea only if there is sufficient evidence that proves the issue or idea is correct. Clifford (2) argues that there is no justification for an individual to believe on a claim or idea without witness any sufficient evidence. According to Clifford (2) this kind of a person violates the law that regulates the ethics of belief. On the other(a) hand, Clifford also argues that when the evidence is sufficient enough to prove a claim, and people still do not believe a claim, then these people are also guilty of breaching the laws that regulate the ethics of belief (Clifford, 7). On this basis, it is important to announce that belief has a law, and the main tenet of this law lies on the existence of an evidence. Clifford (1) effectively manages to use the example of a channelise possessor for purposes of explaining and justifying his theories of evidentialism. For instance, Clifford denotes that a institutionalize owner failed to observe the laws that govern the ethics of belief by allowing his ship to sail, when he had doubts over the capability of the same ship to make a voyage. The ship under consideration was old, and needed many repairs (Clifford, 2). Despite these facts, the ship owner decided to allow the ship to make a voyage, just because the same ship had made many successful voyages before, and in the same condition. This, in Cliffords view is against the laws that govern and regulate the ethics of belief. On this basis therefore, the ship owner was wrong, and it doesnt matter whether the voyage was successful or not. From his explanations, we can denote that Clifford was of the opinion that the ship owner had an option of carrying out an investigation to prove on the ability of the ship to make a voyage. This is by making the necessary repairs, and having experts to examine its capability. The ship owner comes under desolate criticisms from Clifford, because his actions were based on faith and providence, and in Cliffords opinion, these do not justify the belief of a claim (Clifford, 12). Clifford also gives an explanation of consciousnes